European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/emission/


Overview

Market Size and Scope

Offset Project Eligibility

Additionality and Quantification Procedures

Project Approval Process

Selected Issues

References


Overview

Type of Standard and Context

The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) is a mandatory cap and trade program, which allows operators use of compliance carbon credits from Kyoto project based mechanisms (Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation), up to a certain limit. The EU ETS began in January 2005 as the first emissions trading scheme to regulate GHG emissions and continues to be the largest (Ellis and Tirpak, 2006). The EU ETS is a key component to the EU climate policy commitment to the Kyoto Protocol and beyond (Kopp, 2007). Emissions sources regulated by the EU ETS include 12,000 downstream emissions sources, accounting for half of all EU emissions, from the following industrial sectors: iron and steel; cement, glass, and ceramics; pulp and paper; electric-power generation; and refineries (Kopp, 2007). The cap covers only CO2 emissions, but may in the future include other GHGs, as well as air transport emissions (Kopp. 2007). The implementation of the EU ETS began with Phase I (2005-2007) which - although mandatory - was primarily designed as a trial period. It is currently in Phase II (2008-2012), which coincides with the Kyoto commitment period. For Phase III of the EU ETS several revisions to the scheme are planned including a single EU-wide cap to increase harmonization. (Capoor and Ambrosi, 2009). On September 30, 2010 the final Phase III annual emissions cap for the EU ETS is expected to be announced (Capoor and Ambrosi, 2009).

Emissions sources regulated by the EU ETS may meet their compliance obligation either through surrendering emissions allowances (EUAs) or they may supplement in part allowances through the purchase of offset credits available through the Kyoto Protocol project based mechanisms, including CDM and JI credits. Regulated entities which do not meet their compliance obligation are required to pay, as of 2008, a penalty of $157 (€ 100) per metric ton, and are required to make up the shortfall in subsequent calendar years, in addition to having their names published and being ‘named and shamed’ for non-compliance. Under the EU ETS program, the use of CDM and JI project credits is supposed to be “supplemental” to emissions reductions that take place within the EU. Limitations on the use of CDM/JI credits for compliance under the EU ETS vary by member state. Under Phase II of the EU ETS, the member state emissions cap, the CO2 emission source allowance allocations, and member state limit on the use of CDM/JI credits are based on National Allocation Plans (NAPs) submitted by each member state for approval by the European Commission. Member States specify a limit up to which individual installations will be able to use external credits to comply with the ETS. These limits vary between 0% (Estonia) and 22% (Germany) of allowances. There are also restrictions on use of CERs from forestry projects and from certain types of large hydro projects. Under the third phase (2013-2020) the system of national allocation plans will be abandoned to make place for harmonized EU-wide caps and allocation rules.

Standard Authority and Administrative Bodies

The EU ETS has been established through binding legislation proposed by the European Commission and approved by the EU Member States and the European Parliament. The Member States are responsible for the implementation of the emission trading scheme at the national level, in line with the National Allocation Plans approved by the Commission. They also have to submit annual reports on the implementation of the Directive to the Commission, in line with Article 21 of the ETS Directive. National administrators of the scheme manage national registries, while the Commission oversees the Community Independent Transaction Log (CITL) at the Community level, which registers changes in national registries. The proposed reform of the EU ETS envisages that from 2013 onwards the European emissions trading system will be more harmonized through abolishing National Allocation Plans, introducing auctioning as a primary method of allocation (with 100% auctioning for electricity production and a gradual increase of auctioning for other industrial processes covered by the system. The transitional free allocation will be based on benchmarking. Compliance of individual installations is attested by annual compliance reports which are verified by the European Commission.

Regional Scope

The EU ETS focuses on emission reduction targets for the 27 member states of the EU and targets for the countries that have linked their trading system to the EU ETS. For the time being this includes Norway, Iceland and Lichtenstein.

Recognition of Other Standards/ Linkage with Other Trading Systems

The EU Linking Directive, which was passed in 2004, allows operators in phase 2 of the ETS to use credits from Joint Implementation (JI) and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to meet their targets in place of emission cuts within the EU. The EU ETS has been open to linking with other countries that have ratified the Kyoto Protocol and established compatible greenhouse gas emission trading systems, in order to enlarge the market for trading. The first expansion of the EU ETS took place on 1 January 2008, when Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein joined the EU ETS (European Commission, 2007). As well, preliminary discussions on future linkages have taken place with other programs and countries. The EU ETS has expressed interest in and encouragement for plans to set up absolute and mandatory cap and trade emissions trading systems in Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, California, RGGI, and other US states and Canadian provinces. In October 2007, the International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) was created, of which the EU is a founder member, in order to help support the linking of the EU ETS with other compatible trading systems in future (European Commission, 2007).

back to top

Market Size and Scope

Tradable Unit and Pricing Information

Tradable units and pricing information for offset credits under the EU ETS are based on those used for the CDM and JI project based mechanisms respectively. Because the EU is the greatest purchaser of such credits the secondary market price for JI/CDM credits follows the same trend as the price for EUA's, be it with a discount to take account of delivery uncertainties.

Participants/Buyers

Participants and buyers of CDM and JI offset credits under the EU ETS include regulated emissions sources, as well as EU Member States themselves. Major European banks and other financial institutions both in the private and public sector have also become active in providing finance or managing funds for prospective emission reduction projects (European Commission, 2007)

Current Project Portfolio

Limits on the use of CDM and JI credits for compliance under Phase II of the EU ETS vary by Member State, as shown in Table 1, based on National Allocation Plans (NAPs) submitted by each Member State to the European Commission for review and approval. Based on these national limits, the upper limit for the total use of JI/CDM credits under the EU ETS under Phase II is 278.2 MMtCO2e per year, as shown in the last column of Table 1.

To date, European buyers have dominated the CDM market and it is estimated that much of the demand from EU ETS regulated entities for CDM and JI credits has already been contracted either directly by the regulated installations themselves, or indirectly by institutions planning to sell the credits back on the secondary market (Capoor and Ambrosi, 2007).

Table 1. EU ETS National Allocation Plans Summary Table

Member State

Annual Cap 2008-2012 in MMt CO2e

Annual JI/CDM limit in %

Annual JI/CDM limit in MMt CO2e

Austria

30.7

10

3.1

Belgium

58.5

8.4

4.9

Bulgaria

42.3

12.55

5.3

Cyprus

5.48

10

0.5

Czech Rep.

86.8

10

8.7

Denmark

24.5

17.01

4.2

Estonia

12.72

0

0.0

Finland

37.6

10

3.8

France

132.8

13.5

17.9

Germany

453.1

20

90.6

Greece

69.1

9

6.2

Hungary

26.9

10

2.7

Iceland

 

 

 

Ireland

22.3

10

2.2

Italy

195.8

14.99

29.4

Latvia

3.43

10

0.3

Lichtenstein

 

 

 

Lithuania

8.8

20

1.8

Luxembourg

2.5

10

0.3

Malta

2.1

tbd

tbd

Netherlands

85.8

10

8.6

Norway

 

 

 

Poland

208.5

10

20.9

Portugal

34.8

10

3.5

Romania

75.9

10

7.6

Slovakia

30.9

7

2.2

Slovenia

8.3

15.76

1.3

Spain

152.3

ca. 20

30.5

Sweden

22.8

10

2.3

UK

246.2

8

19.7

Total

2080.93

-

278.2

Values calculated by the author based on emissions cap and JI/CDM % limit.

Source: European Commission, 2007a

back to top

Offset Project Eligibility

Project Types

During the second phase all CDM and JI project types are eligible, except those from nuclear facilities and land use, land-use change and forestry activities. In the case of hydroelectric power production project activities with a generating capacity exceeding 20 MW, Member States shall ensure that relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the World Commission on Dams November 2000 Report “Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making”, will be respected during the development of such project activities. (European Commission, 2007).

Project Locations

CDM and JI requirements apply.

Project Size

CDM and JI requirements apply.

Start Date 

CDM and JI requirements apply.

Crediting Period

CDM and JI requirements apply.

Co-benefit Objectives and Requirements

CDM and JI requirements apply.

back to top

Additionality and Quantification Procedures

Additionality Requirements

CDM and JI requirements apply.

Quantification Protocols

CDM and JI requirements apply.

back to top

Project Approval Process

Validation and Registration

CDM and JI requirements apply.

Monitoring, Verification and Certification

CDM and JI requirements apply.

Registries and Fees

CDM and JI requirements apply.

back to top

Selected Issues

Built on the US experience in sulfur oxide (SOx) emission trading, the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) is the first practical experiment in GHG emission trading. It has made a significant contribution to the establishment of a global carbon market by placing a clear constraint on carbon dioxide (CO2) emission by market participants where none existed before. The implementation of the first phase of the EU ETS has several important lessons for subsequent phases as well as for the design of market-based programs currently under development in other countries. To share its experience, in October 2007, the EU co-founded the International Carbon Action Partnership with a group of countries and regions that had either established a mandatory cap and trade system or were actively pursuing one (EC, 2007).

The EU ETS has been the primary driver of growth in the offset credit market. It allowed offset credits generated under the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) to be used under the EU ETS, creating demand for these credits and mobilizing investments in low carbon technologies in developing countries and in countries with economies in transition (EIT). However, concerns have been raised by NGOs, such as the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), about the use of CDM and JI credits. These organizations argue that the substantial use of offset credits is locking the EU into high carbon investments (WWF-UK, 2007).

Limits on the use of CDM and JI credits in the second phase of the EU ETS range from 0% of the annual emission allowances allocated in Estonia to 20% in Germany, Lithuania and Spain (EC, 2007a). When these limits are compared to the actual reductions that would be needed, it appears that, in some countries, no domestic reductions will be required, thereby defeating the supplementarity principle of the EU ETS which requires the use of offset credits to be supplemental to domestic action to achieve emission reductions. This is confirmed in the WWF’s analysis of the second phase limits on the use of CDM/JI credits applicable in nine countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Poland, Ireland, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Portugal and Italy) representing 80% of the EU’s emissions, where it concluded that 88–100% of the actual emission reductions required each year could be achieved through CDM and JI credits. The WWF recommends that this figure not exceed 50% (WWF-UK, 2007). However, the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) contends that these limits on the use of CDM and JI credits reduce the system’s ability to mobilize significant capital for low carbon technologies and increase the abatement costs for industry to prohibitively high levels (IETA, n.d.).

Other issues have been raised, including the sustainability impact of CDM and JI projects, the need to increase participation in under-represented countries and sectors, and the varying approval processes in different member countries. Regarding sustainability, the WWF recommends that all of the CDM and JI credits used under the EU ETS should be certified by the Gold Standard (WWF-UK, 2007), while the IETA argues for more diverse approaches to demonstrating environmental additionality to increase participation (IETA, n.d.). IETA also proposes the expansion of eligible offset project types to include land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) projects, which are currently exempt under the EU ETS, and the proposed harmonization of the approval process of CDM and JI projects across EU member states in Phase III (IETA, n.d.).

For its third phase, post-2012, the EU advocates the transition of the CDM beyond a pure project-by-project offsetting mechanism to a broader crediting approach. Such an approach could enable a massive scale-up of clean low-emission technologies and would potentially increase the environmental integrity of offsets and also facilitate contributions from developing countries. The EU is also considering other means of scaling up participation among developing countries using sector-based approaches such as binding sector-wide targets or ‘no-lose targets’, where credits are awarded for beating emission targets but no penalties are imposed for missing them.

back to top

References

Ellis, J. and D. Tirpak. (2006). Linking GHG Emission Trading Systems and Markets. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Energy Agency. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2006)6. October 2006.

European Commission. (2007). EU action against climate change: EU emissions trading — an open system promoting global innovation. European Commission. November 2007.

European Comission. (2007a). Emissions trading: EU-wide cap for 2008-2012 set at 2.08 billion allowances after assessment of national plans for Bulgaria. Press Release. 7 Dec 2007.

IETA. (n.d.). Linking the EU ETS with emerging emissions trading schemes. IETA.

Kopp, Raymond. (2007). An Overview of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Congressional Testimony prepared for the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Roundtable on the EU ETS. March 26, 2007.

Natsource. (n.d.). European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). Accessed 04 March 2008.

WWF-UK. (2007). Emission Impossible: access to JI/CDM credits in phase II of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. WWF. June 2007.