Home > Policy Information > Comparisons of Offset Programs > Comparison Table 3: Offset Project Eligibility |
Comparison Table 3: Offset Project Eligibility
Read about Project Eligibility
Name of Program |
Eligible Project Locations |
Eligible Project Types |
Project Start Date |
International offset mechanisms |
|||
Clean Development Mechanism |
Developing (non-Annex 1) countries where Designated National Authorities (DNAs) are established |
All eligible except nuclear energy, new HCFC-22 facilities or avoided deforestation |
January 1, 2000 |
Joint Implementation |
Annex 1 countries that are signatories to the Kyoto Protocol with capped emissions |
Same as CDM plus forest management, cropland management, and grazing management, ineligible under CDM are eligible under JI. |
January 1, 2000 |
Offset features of mandatory cap-and-trade systems |
|||
European Union Emissions Trading Scheme |
CDM and JI restriction apply. |
All eligible except nuclear energy, new HCFC-22 facilities and LULUCF. |
CDM and JI requirements apply |
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative |
Within RGGI participating states or other approved jurisdictions; if emission allowances exceed the Stage 2 trigger price (US$10), the eligible project locations is expanded to include offsets from any governmental mandatory program outside the US with a tonnage limit on GHG emissions. |
|
December 20, 2005 |
Western Climate Initiative |
WCI may approve certified offsets from projects in the US, Canada, and Mexico; and, CDM offsets, subject to added criteria or standards |
Under development. Priorities for protocol investigation and development include:
|
Under development |
Midwest Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord |
Not yet specified. |
Not yet specified. |
Not yet specified. |
Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases |
Canada |
Project types to be reviewed for consideration include: afforestation, landfill gas capture and combustion, reduced or no tillage, wind, forest management, wastewater management, and anaerobic biodigesters. |
January 1, 2006 |
Australian Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme |
Under development. Design recommendations include both domestic and international offset projects. |
Under development. Design recommendations have prioritized the following project types: land use, forestry, wood products, avoided deforestation and carbon geosequestration |
Under development |
New South Wales Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme |
Within New South Wales only, except for electricity generation projects which can be within the Australian National Electricity Market. |
|
Electricity generation: January 1 2003; Demand side management: January 1, 2002 in NSW and January 1, 2004 in the ACT; Carbon sequestration: January 1, 2003 |
Offset features of voluntary cap and trade systems |
|||
Chicago Climate Exchange |
Any country except European Union Emission Trading Scheme member countries or Annex 1 countries that are signatories to the Kyoto Protocol |
Energy efficiency and fuel switching, coal mine methane, agricultural methane, agricultural soil carbon, rangeland soil carbon, forestry carbon, landfill methane, ozone depleting substance (ODS) destruction and renewable energy. |
January 1, 1999; Forestry projects: January 1, 1990; ODS projects: January 1, 2007 |
Offset features of other GHG systems |
|||
Alberta Offset System |
Alberta only |
Acid gas injection, anaerobic wastewater treatment, beef feeding, beef-feed days, beef lifecycle, biofuel, biogas, biomass, compost, energy efficiency, enhanced oil recovery, streamlined enhanced oil recovery, landfill bioreactor, landfill gas, modal freight, non-incineration of thermal waste, pork, road rehabilitation, run-of-the-river electricity systems, solar electricity systems, tillage, waste heat recovery, streamlined waste heat recovery and wind-powered electricity systems. |
January 1, 2002 |
State power plant rules (OR, WA, MA) |
Oregon: Any location |
OR: No limitations or specifications |
OR: Within 2 years of new project |
Washington: Not specified |
WA: No limitations or specifications with approval |
WA: July 1, 2004 |
|
Massachusetts: Anywhere in the US or US coastal waters. Approved EUAs and CERs have no restrictions. |
MA: Any except nuclear power generation, underwater and underground sequestration. |
MA: January 1, 2006 |
|
British Columbia Emission Offset Regulation |
British Columbia |
No current restrictions |
November 29, 2007 |
Climate Leaders |
Protocols applicable to US projects. Project developers that are able to develop a performance standard and country-specific data for an international project type can propose an international project. |
Current eligible projects:
Additional project types eligible with protocol approval by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). |
February 20, 2002 |
GHG Accounting Protocols |
|||
WBCSD/WRI GHG Protocol for Project Accounting |
Not defined |
Project guidance can be applied to any project type. Specific guidelines have been developed for grid-connected electricity and LULUCF projects. |
Not defined |
ISO 14064 |
Note defined |
Not defined |
Not defined |
Voluntary Standards for Offset Projects and Retailers |
|||
Climate Action Reserve |
US |
Current eligible projects: conservation-based forest management; reforestation; avoided conversion; tree planting projects by municipalities, utilities, and universities; livestock and landfill methane capture. |
Carbon sequestration: January 1, 1990; Methane capture: January 1, 2001 |
Gold Standard |
All locations, except in countries with emission caps unless Gold Standard (GS) Verified Emission Reductions (VERs) are backed by permanently retiring assigned amount units (AAUs) |
Renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. Additional rules and requirements for hydropower larger than 20 MW |
January 1, 2006 |
Voluntary Carbon Standard 2007 |
All locations, except in countries with emission caps unless voluntary carbon units (VCUs) are backed by permanently retiring AAUs. |
All project types eligible with VCS approved methodology, except projects from new industrial gas facilities |
January 1, 2002; Future restrictions: Start date must be within 2 years of validation date. |
VER+ |
All locations, except in countries with emission caps unless VERs are backed by permanently retiring AAUs. |
VER+ accepts all project types except HFC projects, nuclear energy projects, large hydropower projects over 80MW. Hydro projects exceeding 20MW have to conform with World Commission on Dams rules. LULUCF projects, including REDD, are accepted if implemented with a buffer approach to address the risk of non-permanence. |
January 1, 2005. Retroactive crediting limited to 2 years back from the registration date and will be phased out by the end of 2009. |
American Carbon Registry |
No restrictions on project location. |
No restrictions. All projects that meet the ACR Technical Standard are eligible for registration. |
Non-LULUCF projects: January1, 2000. |
Climate Community and Biodiversity Standards |
All locations. |
Bio-sequestration projects, including:
|
No restrictions on project start date. |
Plan Vivo |
Developing countries |
Bio-sequestration projects:
|
No restrictions on project start date. |
Social Carbon Methodology |
Developing countries |
Eligible project types not defined. |
No restrictions on project start date. |
Green-e Climate Protocol for Renewable Energy |
US |
Renewable energy projects: wind, solar, hydropower (up to 5MW; additional specifications), geothermal, methane capture, ocean thermal, wave and tidal; New project types evaluated on case-by-case basis energy |
January 1, 2005 |
Green-e Climate Program |
Specified by applicable offset standard |
CDM standard requirements except LULUCF and hydropower >10 MW excluded; All VCS 2007 except hydropower >10 MW and additional native species requirement for carbon sequestration projects |
January 1, 2000 |
Carbon Finance Funds |
|||
World Bank Carbon Finance Funds |
No limitations beyond CDM and JI restrictions. Requirements can vary by fund. |
CDM/JI requirements apply. Additional limitations vary by fund. |
CDM/JI requirements apply |
